Oughtonomy in healthcare. A deconstructive reading of Kantian autonomy
Identifieur interne : 000033 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000032; suivant : 000034Oughtonomy in healthcare. A deconstructive reading of Kantian autonomy
Auteurs : Ignaas Devisch [Belgique]Source :
- Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy [ 1386-7423 ] ; 2010-11-01.
Descripteurs français
- Wicri :
- topic : Autonomie.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Abstract: For years now, autonomy has been discussed as one of the central values in health care. Understood as self-realization, it is opposed to paternalism which is conceived as an intolerable occurrence of heteronomy. Although different concepts have been developed to nuance this opposition, when it comes to health care discourse, heteronomy is still the enemy of autonomy. In our article, we defend the thesis that autonomy is only achievable as heteronomy. We are not arguing for an expansion of the meaning of autonomy, but are attempting to conduct an analysis which lays bare the ‘disrupting’ attendance of heteronomy within the principle of autonomy. Autonomy does not begin where heteronomy ends, but can only begin if heteronomy is already involved. To emphasize this, we prefer to elaborate a new concept: ‘oughtonomy’. This concept is inspired by Jacques Derrida’s distinction between ‘difference’ and ‘differance’. We will develop the concept of oughtonomy from a deconstructive reading of Kant’s idea of autonomy, inspired by philosophers such as Jacob Rogozinski, Jean-Luc Nancy and others. In addition to a first exploration of this concept, this article also discusses the possible consequences of oughtonomy for current debates concerning health care. Our quest for a new understanding of autonomy is motivated by the concern that, although the accent on autonomy as self-realization and independence has many advantages, we should also bear in mind the countless disadvantages.
Url:
DOI: 10.1007/s11019-010-9258-z
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Oughtonomy in healthcare. A deconstructive reading of Kantian autonomy</title><author><name sortKey="Devisch, Ignaas" sort="Devisch, Ignaas" uniqKey="Devisch I" first="Ignaas" last="Devisch">Ignaas Devisch</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:255B801665FC64D343C1D217401A5F39400AABAF</idno><date when="2010" year="2010">2010</date><idno type="doi">10.1007/s11019-010-9258-z</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/255B801665FC64D343C1D217401A5F39400AABAF/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000201</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000201</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000199</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000033</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Exploration">000033</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Oughtonomy in healthcare. A deconstructive reading of Kantian autonomy</title><author><name sortKey="Devisch, Ignaas" sort="Devisch, Ignaas" uniqKey="Devisch I" first="Ignaas" last="Devisch">Ignaas Devisch</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><country xml:lang="fr">Belgique</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Ethics, Philosophy and Medical Philosophy, Ghent University, Campus Heymans (UZ) 3B3, De Pintelaan 185, Ghent</wicri:regionArea><orgName type="university">Université de Gand</orgName><placeName><settlement type="city">Gand</settlement><region>Région flamande</region><region type="district" nuts="2">Province de Flandre-Orientale</region></placeName></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country wicri:rule="url">Belgique</country></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country wicri:rule="url">Belgique</country></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy</title><title level="j" type="sub">A European Journal</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Med Health Care and Philos</title><idno type="ISSN">1386-7423</idno><idno type="eISSN">1572-8633</idno><imprint><publisher>Springer Netherlands</publisher><pubPlace>Dordrecht</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2010-11-01">2010-11-01</date><biblScope unit="volume">13</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="303">303</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="312">312</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1386-7423</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1386-7423</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Autonomy</term><term>Deconstruction</term><term>Derrida</term><term>Heidegger</term><term>Heteronomy</term><term>Kant</term><term>Paternalism</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Autonomie</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract: For years now, autonomy has been discussed as one of the central values in health care. Understood as self-realization, it is opposed to paternalism which is conceived as an intolerable occurrence of heteronomy. Although different concepts have been developed to nuance this opposition, when it comes to health care discourse, heteronomy is still the enemy of autonomy. In our article, we defend the thesis that autonomy is only achievable as heteronomy. We are not arguing for an expansion of the meaning of autonomy, but are attempting to conduct an analysis which lays bare the ‘disrupting’ attendance of heteronomy within the principle of autonomy. Autonomy does not begin where heteronomy ends, but can only begin if heteronomy is already involved. To emphasize this, we prefer to elaborate a new concept: ‘oughtonomy’. This concept is inspired by Jacques Derrida’s distinction between ‘difference’ and ‘differance’. We will develop the concept of oughtonomy from a deconstructive reading of Kant’s idea of autonomy, inspired by philosophers such as Jacob Rogozinski, Jean-Luc Nancy and others. In addition to a first exploration of this concept, this article also discusses the possible consequences of oughtonomy for current debates concerning health care. Our quest for a new understanding of autonomy is motivated by the concern that, although the accent on autonomy as self-realization and independence has many advantages, we should also bear in mind the countless disadvantages.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>Belgique</li></country><region><li>Province de Flandre-Orientale</li><li>Région flamande</li></region><settlement><li>Gand</li></settlement><orgName><li>Université de Gand</li></orgName></list><tree><country name="Belgique"><region name="Région flamande"><name sortKey="Devisch, Ignaas" sort="Devisch, Ignaas" uniqKey="Devisch I" first="Ignaas" last="Devisch">Ignaas Devisch</name></region><name sortKey="Devisch, Ignaas" sort="Devisch, Ignaas" uniqKey="Devisch I" first="Ignaas" last="Devisch">Ignaas Devisch</name><name sortKey="Devisch, Ignaas" sort="Devisch, Ignaas" uniqKey="Devisch I" first="Ignaas" last="Devisch">Ignaas Devisch</name></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Musique/explor/DiesIraeV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000033 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000033 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Musique
|area= DiesIraeV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:255B801665FC64D343C1D217401A5F39400AABAF
|texte= Oughtonomy in healthcare. A deconstructive reading of Kantian autonomy
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |